UBUseBrowserTools

JPG vs PNG vs WebP: Which Should You Use?

Use JPG for photos, PNG for logos, screenshots and anything with sharp text or transparency, and WebP when you want the smallest files for a fast website.

Last updated: 2026-07-17

The quick answer

  • JPG — photographs and realistic images. Small files, but lossy and no transparency.
  • PNG — logos, icons, screenshots, diagrams, and anything needing a transparent background. Lossless and sharp, but larger.
  • WebP — the modern all-rounder: photo quality at much smaller sizes than JPG, with transparency support. Best for websites.

JPG: for photos

JPG uses lossy compression tuned for photographs, so it produces small files where slight detail loss is invisible. The trade-offs: no transparency, and repeatedly saving degrades it. Avoid JPG for text and logos — artifacts make edges fuzzy. Convert with PNG to JPG and JPG to PNG.

PNG: for graphics and transparency

PNG is lossless, so text stays razor-sharp and colours exact, and it supports transparency. Ideal for logos, UI screenshots and diagrams. The cost is size — a photo as PNG can be several times larger than as JPG.

WebP: for fast websites

WebP is typically 25–35% smaller than JPG at the same quality, with transparency support, and every modern browser handles it. If you run a website, convert with the WebP Converter.

Whatever you choose, compress it

An oversized image is slow in any format. Run finals through the Image Compressor before publishing.

Frequently asked questions

Is WebP better than JPG?

For websites, usually yes — similar quality at 25–35% smaller sizes, plus transparency. JPG is still fine for simple photo sharing where universal compatibility matters most.

Should I use PNG or JPG for a screenshot?

PNG. Screenshots contain sharp text and UI edges that JPG compression blurs.

Tools used in this guide

More guides